The Power sector in India has
undergone fundamental transformation of its institutional structure after the
enactment of Electricity 2003. One of the most important transformations has
been the introduction of Open Access in Indian power sector and further
creation of Power Market. This brought a chunk of advantages to the power
industry which was primarily vertically integrated; controlled by monopolistic
state electricity boards.
Evolution of
Power Exchange
Open Access in inter-state
transmission was introduced in May 2004 which facilitated the development of
the bilateral market in the country which opened up very encouraging results.
However, in order to further streamline the bilateral transactions and to
facilitate the implementation of trade of Power in India, Central Electricity
Regulatory Commission (CERC) took several significant initiatives. In July 2006,
the commission took a giant leap forward in developing the electricity market
in the country and floated a discussion paper on “Development a Common Platform
for Electricity Trading”.
As Open Access in Inter State
Transmission Regulation 2004 provided only for the bilateral transaction, the
transactions discovered through anonymous bidding on a Power Exchange were not envisaged.
The system of application of transmission charges was in Rs/Megawatt/day. A
single regional postage stamp was applied in case of intra-regional
transactions for transmission charges and losses. These methodologies for
transmission charges & losses were not conducive to the operation of a
common platform for electricity trading or Power Exchange.
In view of above shortcomings,
CERC revised the Regulation for Open Access in Inter-State Transmission” to
include collective transactions discovered on a power exchange and the new
regulation became effective on 1st April 2008.
With the above provisions in
place, Indian Energy Exchange (IEX), the country’s first Power Exchange, made
an application for grant of permission to setup a Power Exchange in March 2007
and an in-principle approval was accorded by the CERC on 31st August 2007. IEX
commenced operations from the 27th June 2008 after the Rules and Bye Laws were
approved by CERC and permission was granted to commence operations. The second
Power Exchange, Power Exchange of India (PXIL), was granted in-principle
approval on 27th May 2008. PXIL went through a process of Regulatory approval
similar to IEX and commenced operations on 22nd October 2008.
Power
Exchange: Changes that Followed
Introduction of power exchanges
has acted as a catalyst for the short term power market in India. Short term
market which is being constituted by bilateral transactions, power exchange
transaction and UI transactions has witnessed a CAGR of 23.60 percent since
2008-09. Share of short term transaction as a percentage of total power
generation in the country, has also increased from 6 percent in 2008-09 to
around 11 percent in 2012-13. The chronology of short term power trade vis-à-vis
total electricity generation in the country has been represented in figure 2.
Among the various transactions
driving the growth of short term market in India, it is found that those associated
with power exchange have played a major role in development of short term power
market in India. Out of an overall growth of 23.60 percent, since 2008-09, power
exchange transaction have grown with a rate of 71 percent, while bilateral and
UI transactions have grown with their respective share of 19 and 15 percent.
Transaction wise details of short term power market have been represented in
figure 3.
It is also evident from above
figure that since 2008-09, overall quantum of bilateral and UI transaction is
higher in comparison to the power exchange transactions. However, in last two
years it has been seen that the transactions under the UI and Bilateral have
witness a significant dip, while transactions in power exchanges are on
continuous rise.
Huge surge in power exchange
transactions owes to the fact that, the exchange provides a transparent
mechanism, which is completely driven by demand and supply of electricity,
thereby promoting competition in mechanism of power trading. Due to
competition, electricity prices in short term market has also witnessed a
significant dip, which is driving beneficiaries to schedule more and more power
from exchange rather than drawing through UI mechanism, resulting dip in UI
transactions. With low UI transactions share in power trading, more disciplined
grid operations can be expected. Therefore, it can be anticipated that, power
exchanges are not only promoting competition, but they are also bringing more
discipline into electricity grid.
Opportunities
growing forward
Power exchanges have offered a
dynamic environment to operate the sector through market forces of demand and
supply. Nonetheless, there is a lot of ground yet to be covered, which includes
improving and enhancing the reliability and security of the power system
through ancillary services and implementation of regional power trade in SAARC
countries (similar to one in Nord Pool).
In April, 2013, CERC has
introduced the staff paper on “Introduction of Ancillary Services in Indian
Electricity Market”. Under this, the commission has sought to introduce three
types of ancillary services, mainly Frequency Support Ancillary Services
(FSAS), Voltage Control Ancillary Services (VCAS) and Black Start Ancillary
Services (BSAS) for enhancing the reliability and security of Indian power
market. In this overall framework, the commission has assigned a significant
role to power exchanges in modalities of ancillary services. The commission has
envisaged the implementation of ancillary services would be facilitated through
bidding in the power exchanges. Further, it also contemplates that a separate
product could be constituted for this purpose, comprising of sellers interested
in participating in the ancillary service market.
Besides this, there still exists
the need to learn lessons from the experience of already developed power markets, such as
Nordic Power Market – the world’s first international commodity for electrical
power, in organizing trade with standard physical and financial power contracts
both in spot and derivative markets. Similar to Nordic Power Market, there are
huge prospects for integration of SAARC region for regional power trade. On
this front, the Planning Commission of India through Integrated Energy Policy
has already indicated the import of hydro power from Nepal and Bhutan
(eliciting the combined potential of about 55000 MW) as possibly the major
source of energy security for India.
With integration of SAARC
regional power market, there would be a significant market for financial power
contracts in future, which would allow power exchanges to capitalize on these
financial contracts.
Infraline Energy Power Research Team
The Power sector in India has
undergone fundamental transformation of its institutional structure after the
enactment of Electricity 2003. One of the most important transformations has
been the introduction of Open Access in Indian power sector and further
creation of Power Market. This brought a chunk of advantages to the power
industry which was primarily vertically integrated; controlled by monopolistic
state electricity boards.
Evolution of
Power Exchange
Open Access in inter-state
transmission was introduced in May 2004 which facilitated the development of
the bilateral market in the country which opened up very encouraging results.
However, in order to further streamline the bilateral transactions and to
facilitate the implementation of trade of Power in India, Central Electricity
Regulatory Commission (CERC) took several significant initiatives. In July 2006,
the commission took a giant leap forward in developing the electricity market
in the country and floated a discussion paper on “Development a Common Platform
for Electricity Trading”.
As Open Access in Inter State
Transmission Regulation 2004 provided only for the bilateral transaction, the
transactions discovered through anonymous bidding on a Power Exchange were not envisaged.
The system of application of transmission charges was in Rs/Megawatt/day. A
single regional postage stamp was applied in case of intra-regional
transactions for transmission charges and losses. These methodologies for
transmission charges & losses were not conducive to the operation of a
common platform for electricity trading or Power Exchange.
In view of above shortcomings,
CERC revised the Regulation for Open Access in Inter-State Transmission” to
include collective transactions discovered on a power exchange and the new
regulation became effective on 1st April 2008.
With the above provisions in
place, Indian Energy Exchange (IEX), the country’s first Power Exchange, made
an application for grant of permission to setup a Power Exchange in March 2007
and an in-principle approval was accorded by the CERC on 31st August 2007. IEX
commenced operations from the 27th June 2008 after the Rules and Bye Laws were
approved by CERC and permission was granted to commence operations. The second
Power Exchange, Power Exchange of India (PXIL), was granted in-principle
approval on 27th May 2008. PXIL went through a process of Regulatory approval
similar to IEX and commenced operations on 22nd October 2008.
Power
Exchange: Changes that Followed
Introduction of power exchanges
has acted as a catalyst for the short term power market in India. Short term
market which is being constituted by bilateral transactions, power exchange
transaction and UI transactions has witnessed a CAGR of 23.60 percent since
2008-09. Share of short term transaction as a percentage of total power
generation in the country, has also increased from 6 percent in 2008-09 to
around 11 percent in 2012-13. The chronology of short term power trade vis-à-vis
total electricity generation in the country has been represented in figure 2.
Among the various transactions
driving the growth of short term market in India, it is found that those associated
with power exchange have played a major role in development of short term power
market in India. Out of an overall growth of 23.60 percent, since 2008-09, power
exchange transaction have grown with a rate of 71 percent, while bilateral and
UI transactions have grown with their respective share of 19 and 15 percent.
Transaction wise details of short term power market have been represented in
figure 3.
It is also evident from above
figure that since 2008-09, overall quantum of bilateral and UI transaction is
higher in comparison to the power exchange transactions. However, in last two
years it has been seen that the transactions under the UI and Bilateral have
witness a significant dip, while transactions in power exchanges are on
continuous rise.
Huge surge in power exchange
transactions owes to the fact that, the exchange provides a transparent
mechanism, which is completely driven by demand and supply of electricity,
thereby promoting competition in mechanism of power trading. Due to
competition, electricity prices in short term market has also witnessed a
significant dip, which is driving beneficiaries to schedule more and more power
from exchange rather than drawing through UI mechanism, resulting dip in UI
transactions. With low UI transactions share in power trading, more disciplined
grid operations can be expected. Therefore, it can be anticipated that, power
exchanges are not only promoting competition, but they are also bringing more
discipline into electricity grid.
Opportunities
growing forward




No comments:
Post a Comment