Holistic development of any economy necessitates engagement of a variety of inputs in a perfectly harmonious way. This perfectly holds true for a growing country such as India for whom adequate availability of inputs like skilled manpower, resources and energy constitute key contributors affecting the level of synergy achieved in realizing growth targets. Hence, lack of any of the required inputs holds the potential of drastically derailing the growth plans of a country thereby affecting all of its populace in some or the other way. In India, legitimate concerns have started brewing since development figures, as indicated primarily through industrial growth numbers; have been nowhere near optimistic, especially during the first two quarters of FY14. However, a silver lining has been seen to be emerging with the electricity sector showing increasingly positive signals since June 2013.
Source:
Ministry of Statistics & Programme Implementation (Base Year: 2004-05)
The manufacturing and mining sectors are on a path to gradual
recovery from a severe growth drop observed during FY13, while there has been a
substantial growth in the electricity sector. As another part of the story, the
government has been repeatedly revising its economic growth rate estimates,
always downwards. GDP figures, once targeted to be in the range of 7-8 percent,
have been recently revised to about 5-5.5 percent only for FY14 while actual
achievement during FY13 has been a decade low of 5 percent.
The key factor responsible for this decline has been the issue of
“energy poverty”, especially in rural and semi-rural areas. Most of the countrymen
have been haplessly witnessing power cuts ranging from 6-8 hours, and even
more, which is also a serious factor hampering the industry growth targets of
different states. This “energy poverty” exists on account of a variety of
factors on both the generation as well as transmission and distribution front,
which specifically constitute shortage of coal, degraded coal quality,
transmission constraints and backing down/ shut down of power plants. According
to CEA, in April-September 2013 period, Indian power generators observed a
shortfall of 73.2 BU in power generation due to a variety of reasons of which
coal & gas shortage was observed to be the most predominant one. While
coal based power generation (which contributes about 57 percent to the total
power generation) continues to be the major source of electricity, a shortfall
in supply of coal is causing serious concerns for the whole electricity supply
chain.
Coal India Limited, which achieved a production of 452.21 MT as
against a revised target of 464 MT in FY13, has not been able to fully satisfy
its FSAs with various customers, resulting in customers looking at an
alternative supply option of coal imports. In the last five years, coal imports
have seen a staggering rise of about 40 percent with coking coal imports
increasing at a CAGR of about 11 percent and thermal coal imports increasing at
a CAGR of about 17 percent over the last decade. With government estimates
suggesting the coal demand-supply gap to reach 292 MT by the end of the 12th
FYP, imports
(which stood at about 97.23 MT for thermal coal and 32.2 MT for coking coal in
FY13) are estimated to grow to about 200 MT by 2017.
The inevitability of imported coal playing a major role in
satisfying the country’s energy needs is well understood now and the
government, along with the major customers of coal, has started strategizing to
make the process more economically viable. The key concern in importing coal
from nations like Australia, Indonesia and South Africa are the high prices,
which are much higher than the domestic coal prices. The direct impact of these
high prices falls on the primary consumer which, in India, is the power
generation sector for steam coal and steel manufacturing sector for coking
coal. For power generators, importing coal is a serious financial burden which
cannot be easily transferred to the end consumers, given that the electricity sector
is regulated such that inefficient supply of committed quantity attracts heavy
penalties for generators. A ray of hope, however, lies in the recent evolution
of spot power markets through which prices much higher than the contract prices
of electricity can be availed by electricity generators based on real time
demand-supply situation. This opportunity has provided them the option to
invest in imported coal and has opened up a more reliable supply option of
acquisition of coal mines in other coal bearing nations. Even for the steel
sector, which imports majority of its coking coal requirements due to low
availability of domestic high quality reserves, the option of acquiring coal
mines abroad has increasingly become an attractive option to ensure continuous
supply.
Coal mine acquisitions by Indian players in countries like
Australia, Indonesia, Mozambique etc. has caught up pace since 2005. Various private
sector players like Adani, Essar, GMR, NTPC and even public sector players like
Coal India & SAIL have aggressively acquired coal-rich mines in these
nations. Unfortunately, most of the countries, in which Indian companies have
shown interest, have issues similar to those in India, including that of
inadequacy of infrastructure for transport and export. Generally, the cost of
developing a supporting infrastructure has to be borne by the miner which
requires huge investments creating an unfair burden on individual companies.
Risks also exist related to political stability, law changes and frequency of
tax changes in the nation. An investment can quickly turn unviable for a
company with the slightest change in these factors. For example, in 2011,
Indonesia’s move to change its mining laws and pricing methods resulted in coal
becoming almost four times costlier giving a setback to key buyers. Other major
exporting nations are also in the process of amending their laws which could seriously
affect investors. Therefore, there’s a requirement of an exhaustive assessment
of all the factors prior to investing in overseas assets.
Though the weightage to be assigned to each factor may vary from
country to country, an assessment of top coal supplying countries on the basis
of some of the major factors has been presented as follows:
Countries
|
Australia
|
Indonesia
|
Mozambique
|
South Africa
|
Reserves
|
76.4 BT
|
5.5 BT
|
16 BT
|
30.2 BT
|
Mining Costs
|
High
|
Moderate
|
Moderate
|
Moderate
|
Infrastructure
|
High
|
High. Upgradation Requirement
|
Low. Needs heavy investments
|
Moderate. Inadequate Rail Infrastructure.
|
Tax Regime
|
Transparent. Abolition of MRRT by July 2014 to bring
relief to investors.
|
Frequent changes in mining laws. Favors
domestic players.
|
Favorable to foreign investors with no such
issues of local ownership.
|
No specific mining policy in place.
Encourages local ownership of mines.
|
Political Stability
|
Stable
|
Stable
|
Stable
|
Stable
|
Proximity to Indian Ports
|
Takes about 18 days to India’s west coast
and 14 days to east coast
|
Takes about 12 days to India’s west coast
and 9 days to east coast
|
Takes about 10 days to India’s west coast
and 12 days to east coast
|
Takes 12 days to India’s west coast and 14
days to east coast
|
As can be observed from the table, each country has a specific set
of advantages and disadvantages which may make it attractive or unattractive to
investors depending upon the weightage given to each factor. So it is entirely
up to the investor to take the final call on whether or not to acquire a mining
asset in the country.
Imports, overseas mine acquisitions or being completely dependent
on Coal India for supplies, whatever might be the coal sourcing strategy of
various consumers, the ground reality indicates that the demand for coal is
growing. With no robust plans of the government for energy diversification,
coal will continue to be the prime source of energy in the country for at least
the next 30-40 years. Sourcing coal from outside sources has become more and
more essential to meet the growing demand. The government has also realized
this fact and is continuously working out mechanisms like price pooling of coal
to make imported coal more economically viable for the buyers. The best
possible strategy for the buyers under this scenario is to source coal from a
variety of supply options so as to minimize supply shortage risks to as low
level as possible.
This research emanates out of Mr. Puneet Paliwal’s
contribution to an Infraline publication titled “Mapping Global Coal Assets”,
and he can be contacted on puneet.paliwal@infraline.com in-case of any queries.
Infraline Energy Metals & Mining Research Team


Goyal Energy Solution (GES) is a leading name in the coal trading, coal mines, steel grade coal in north east India.
ReplyDeleteCoal Trader In India